The Quiet Case for Small Language Models in Agentic AI

by Jojo && Aavi · 2026-02-10

Everyone is chasing bigger models.

More parameters. More GPUs. More burn.

A recently published paper from NVIDIA Research argues something far more practical—and honestly, inevitable, that Small Language Models (SLMs) under ~10B parameters are the real future of agentic AI.

Not as a replacement for LLMs—but as the workhorses that actually make agents usable, affordable, and reliable.

Why LLMs Are the Wrong Default for Agents

LLMs shine at open-ended reasoning and general knowledge. Agents mostly don’t need that.

Agent workloads are:

Using a 70B+ parameter model for these tasks is like towing a dinghy with a container ship.

The paper makes a strong point: most agent calls are operational, not philosophical.

What Modern SLMs Can Already Do

According to NVIDIA’s analysis, models like Microsoft’s Phi-3 and Hymba already rival much larger models in:

And they do it:

This isn’t theoretical—it’s operationally obvious once you’ve run agents in production.

The Real Win: Modular Agent Architectures

The paper argues for heterogeneous systems:

This is exactly how real systems scale:

Think microservices, not monoliths—but for cognition.

Why the Industry Is Still Stuck on LLMs

The paper calls out three reasons, and they’re uncomfortably accurate:

A Practical Migration Path

NVIDIA outlines a six-step LLM → SLM conversion loop that’s refreshingly sane:

No rewrite. No moonshots. Just… engineering.

The Takeaway

LLMs aren’t going away.

But agentic AI doesn’t scale on brilliance—it scales on reliability.

And reliability comes from:

SLMs aren’t the future because they’re cheaper. They’re the future because they’re the right tool for the job.